Bartlett, Jamie and Littler, Mark (2011) Inside the EDL: Populist politi. Demos. ISBN 978-1-906693-85-5
PDF (Publisher version)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Official URL: http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/insidetheedl
The English Defence League (EDL) is the biggest populist street movement in a generation. Yet the make-up of the group and what its members believe remain a mystery because it has no formal joining procedures or membership list and much of its activity takes place online.
While leaders of the EDL claim they are a pluralistic, liberal movement that is fighting Islamic extremism, chants heard at demonstrations and the vitriol frequently posted on the EDL’s chat forums suggest otherwise. It is in this context that we have undertaken the first ever large-scale empirical study of the EDL, which comprises responses from 1,295 sympathisers and supporters, and includes data on their demographics, involvement in EDL activity, political attitudes and social views. The results show that, although the EDL is usually understood as an anti-Islamic or anti-Islamist demonstrating group, the reality is more complex.
Supporters are characterised by intense pessimism about the UK's future, worries about immigration and joblessness. This is often mixed with a proactive pride in Britain, British history and British values, which they see as being under attack from Islam. Although their demonstrations have often involved violence and racist chants, many members are democrats who are committed to peaceful protest and other forms of activism.
The collection of large amounts of data from social media presents new opportunities for social research to understand the relationship between off- and online activity. As more movements combine – and blur – virtual and real protest, these questions will become increasingly urgent and important. These surveys, collected through Facebook using a new methodology, offer new ways forward in exploring this challenge.
|Additional Information:||Open Access. Some rights reserved. As the publisher of this work, Demos wants to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written permission. This is subject to the terms of the Demos licence found at the back of this publication. Its main conditions are: ! Demos and the author(s) are credited ! This summary and the address www.demos.co.uk are displayed ! The text is not altered and is used in full ! The work is not resold ! A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Demos. You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the licence. Demos gratefully acknowledges the work of Creative Commons in inspiring our approach to copyright. To find out more go to www.creativecommons.org|
|Schools:||Faculty of Business, Law & Applied Social Studies > Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching|
|Deposited By:||Paul Harrison|
|Deposited On:||26 Sep 2014 13:00|
|Last Modified:||17 May 2016 12:50|
Downloads per month over past year
Downloads for past 30 days
Repository Staff Only: item control page