Thomas, Lois Helene, Watkins, Caroline Leigh, Sutton, Chris J, Forshaw, Denise, Leathley, Michael John, French, Beverley, Burton, CR, Cheater, F, Roe, B, Britt, D, Booth, J and McColl, E (2014) Identifying continence options after stroke (ICONS): a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial. Trials, 15 (1). p. 509. ISSN 1745-6215
PDF (Version of Record - Open Access)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-509
Urinary incontinence (UI) affects half of patients hospitalised after stroke and is often poorly managed. Cochrane systematic reviews have shown some positive impact of conservative interventions (such as bladder training) in reducing UI, but their effectiveness has not been demonstrated with stroke patients.
We conducted a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial of a systematic voiding programme (SVP) for the management of UI after stroke. Stroke services were randomised to receive SVP (n = 4), SVP plus supported implementation (SVP+, n = 4), or usual care (UC, n = 4).
Feasibility outcomes were participant recruitment and retention. The main effectiveness outcome was presence or absence of UI at six and 12 weeks post-stroke. Additional effectiveness outcomes included were the effect of the intervention on different types of UI, continence status at discharge, UI severity, functional ability, quality of life, and death.
It was possible to recruit patients (413; 164 SVP, 125 SVP+, and 124 UC) and participant retention was acceptable (85% and 88% at six and 12 weeks, respectively). There was no suggestion of a beneficial effect on the main outcome at six (SVP versus UC: odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.94; SVP+ versus UC: OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.37) or 12 weeks (SVP versus UC: OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.93; SVP+ versus UC: OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.54 to 2.09).
No secondary outcomes showed a strong suggestion of clinically meaningful improvement in SVP and/or SVP+ arms relative to UC at six or 12 weeks. However, at 12 weeks both intervention arms had higher estimated odds of continence than UC for patients with urge incontinence.
The trial has met feasibility outcomes of participant recruitment and retention. It was not powered to demonstrate effectiveness, but there is some evidence of a potential reduction in the odds of specific types of incontinence. A full trial should now be considered.
|Uncontrolled Keywords (separate with ;):||Cluster randomised controlled trial; Feasibility; Stroke; Urinary incontinence|
|Subjects:||B - Subjects allied to medicine > B700 - Nursing|
|Schools:||Faculty of Health and Wellbeing > Lancashire Clinical Trials Unit|
Faculty of Health and Wellbeing > School of Health Sciences
Faculty of Health and Wellbeing > School of Nursing
|Deposited By:||Bethany Cooke|
|Deposited On:||19 Jan 2015 10:34|
|Last Modified:||19 Oct 2016 19:19|
Downloads per month over past year
Downloads for past 30 days
Repository Staff Only: item control page