Davies, Michelle, Rogers, Paul and Whitelegg, Lisa (2009) Effects of victim gender, victim sexual orientation, victim response and respondent gender on judgements of blame in a hypothetical adolescent rape. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14 (2). pp. 331-338. ISSN 1355-3259
PDF (REF CLA compliant copy)
- Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/978185408X386030
Objectives. Few studies have examined the judgements made towards adolescent rape victims, and none have investigated attributions towards gay male or lesbian adolescents. The current study examined the effects victim gender, victim sexual orientation, victim response, and respondent gender, on attributions of blame in the depicted rape of a 15-year old adolescent.
Methods. A total of 164 respondents read details of this assault before completing 15 attribution judgments.
Results. Respondents were expected to attribute more blame to a victim who was male, gay, and who failed to resist the perpetrator. Male respondents were also expected to be more blaming of the victim than females. Overall these hypotheses were supported.
Conclusion. Results are discussed in relation to the role gender stereotypes and homophobia play within attributions blame in sexual assault cases. Specifically, it seems male adolescent rape victims are subjected to the same negative stereotypes as male adult victims. Implications and ideas for future research are considered.
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology|
|Schools:||College of Health and Wellbeing > School of Psychology|
|Deposited By:||Helen Cooper|
|Deposited On:||04 Aug 2010 16:01|
|Last Modified:||03 Apr 2013 13:20|
Downloads per month over past year
Downloads for past 30 days
Repository Staff Only: item control page