Teaching Spoken English at Junior High School: A Comparison of TPR and PPP

Jones, C, Lees, M, Donohue, N and Smith, K (2015) Teaching Spoken English at Junior High School: A Comparison of TPR and PPP. The Language Teacher, 39 (1). pp. 3-9.

[thumbnail of 39.1tlt_art1(1).pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
818kB

Official URL: http://jalt-publications.org/tlt/articles/4280-tea...

Abstract

This article reports on an experimental methods-comparison study, which was undertaken with beginner level junior high school students (aged 12 and 13) in Japan. The study aimed to investigate which type of teaching, Total Physical Response (TPR) or Present Practice Produce (PPP), was more effective in developing productive and receptive knowledge of a set of collocations. Results showed that both types of teaching had a significant impact upon the development of understanding and using the target language. However, there were no significant differences between the effectiveness of TPR and PPP, apart from a short-term benefit for PPP in terms of receptive knowledge. This shows that both types of teaching can have a positive impact upon learners of this age and level and that there is a need for further research to investigate the effectiveness of these communicative methodologies in this context.


Repository Staff Only: item control page