Davies, Michelle, Gilston, Jennifer and Rogers, Paul (2012) Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, homophobia, gender roles and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27 (14). pp. 2807-2823. ISSN 1552-6518
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260512438281
The relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, attitudes toward gay men, a series of gender role and sexism measures, victim blame and assault severity were investigated. It was predicted that men would display more negative, stereotypical attitudes than women and that male rape myth endorsement would be related to, and predicted by, the other attitude and attribution scales. Respondents comprised 323 undergraduates (146 males and 177 females) from a large University in the Northwest of England. Results broadly conformed to predictions, with men generally more negative than women, and male rape myth acceptance significantly related to female rape myth acceptance, negative attitudes about gay men, gender role attitudes, and victim blame. Furthermore, male rape myth acceptance was predicted by female rape myth acceptance, gender attitudes, and victim blame. Methodological issues and implications for future work and those working with victims are discussed.
|Uncontrolled Keywords (separate with ;):||male rape myths; victim blame; attributions; ambivalent sexism; homophobia;|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology|
|Schools:||College of Health and Wellbeing > School of Psychology|
|Deposited By:||Helen Cooper|
|Deposited On:||05 Jul 2011 10:11|
|Last Modified:||06 Mar 2014 13:06|
Downloads per month over past year
Downloads for past 30 days
Repository Staff Only: item control page