Employing Dietary Comparators to Perform Risk Assessments for Anti-Androgens Without Using Animal Data

Dent, Matthew P., Li, Hequn, Carmiachael, Paul L. and Martin, Francis L orcid iconORCID: 0000-0001-8562-4944 (2019) Employing Dietary Comparators to Perform Risk Assessments for Anti-Androgens Without Using Animal Data. Toxicological Sciences, 167 (2). pp. 375-384. ISSN 1096-6080

[thumbnail of Version of Record]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

470kB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfy245

Abstract

This study investigated the use of androgen receptor (AR) reporter gene assay data in a non-animal exposure-led risk assessment in which in vitro anti-androgenic activity and exposure data were put into context using a naturally occurring comparator substance with a history of dietary consumption. First, several dietary components were screened to identify which selectively interfered with AR signaling in vitro, using the AR CALUX® test. The IC50 values from these dose-response data together with measured or predicted human exposure levels were used to calculate exposure:activity ratios (EARs) for the dietary components and a number of other well-known anti-androgenic substances. Both diindolylmethane (DIM) and resveratrol are specifically-acting dietary anti-androgens. The EARs for several anti-androgens were therefore expressed relative to the EAR of DIM, and how this ‘dietary comparator ratio’ (DCR) approach may be used to make safety decisions was assessed using an exposure-led case study for an anti-androgenic botanical ingredient. This highlights a pragmatic approach which allows novel chemical exposures to be put into context against dietary exposures to natural anti-androgenic substances. The DCR approach may have utility for other modes of action where appropriate comparators can be identified.


Repository Staff Only: item control page