Is Auditory Distraction by Changing-State and Deviant Sounds Underpinned by the Same Mechanism? Evidence from Pupillometry

Marois, Alexandre orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-4127-4134, Marsh, John Everett orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-9494-1287 and François, Vachon (2019) Is Auditory Distraction by Changing-State and Deviant Sounds Underpinned by the Same Mechanism? Evidence from Pupillometry. Biological Psychology, 141 . pp. 64-74. ISSN 0301-0511

[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

718kB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.01.002

Abstract

The mere presence of task-irrelevant auditory stimuli is known to interfere with cognitive functioning. Disruption can be caused by changing auditory distractors (the changing-state effect) or by a sound that deviates from the auditory background (the deviation effect). The unitary account of auditory distraction explains both phenomena in terms of attentional capture whereas the duplex-mechanism account posits that they reflect two fundamentally different forms of distraction in which only the deviation effect is caused by attentional capture. To test these predictions, we exploited a physiological index of attention orienting: the pupillary dilation response (PDR). Participants performed visual serial recall while ignoring sequences of spoken letters. These sequences either comprised repeated or changing letters, and one letter could sometimes be replaced by pink noise (the deviant). Recall was poorer in both changing-state and deviant trials. Interestingly, the PDR was elicited by deviant sounds but not changing-state sounds. This physiological dissociation of the changing-state and the deviation effects suggests they are subtended by distinct mechanisms thereby procuring support for the duplex-mechanism account over the unitary account.


Repository Staff Only: item control page