Schroeder, Doris (2008) Dignity: Two Riddles and Four Concepts. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 17 (02). pp. 230-238. ISSN 0963-1801
PDF (Publisher version)
- Published Version
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0963180108080262
“Dissecting Bioethics,” edited by Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry, welcomes contributions on the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of bioethics.
The section is dedicated to the idea that words defined by bioethicists and others should not be allowed to imprison people's actual concerns, emotions, and thoughts. Papers that expose the many meanings of a concept, describe the different readings of a moral doctrine, or provide an alternative angle to seemingly self-evident issues are therefore particularly appreciated.
The themes covered in the section so far include dignity, naturalness, public interest, community, disability, autonomy, parity of reasoning, symbolic appeals, and toleration.
|Uncontrolled Keywords (separate with ;):||euthanasia; physician-assisted suicide; Kantian dignity; comportment dignity; aristocratic dignity; meritorious dignity|
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)|
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
K Law > K Law (General)
|Schools:||College of Health and Wellbeing > School of Health Sciences|
|Deposited By:||Cathy Lennon|
|Deposited On:||26 Jan 2012 13:59|
|Last Modified:||06 Jan 2016 18:40|
Downloads per month over past year
Downloads for past 30 days
Repository Staff Only: item control page