Peterson, Richard (2013) Social Memory and Ritual Performance. Journal of Social Archaeology, 13 (2). pp. 266-283. ISSN 1469-6053
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469605312455768
This paper is concerned with archaeological evidence for the mechanisms by which group memory is transmitted. How do natural places such as caves and rock shelters retain their status as foci for ritual activity? It draws upon recent social and archaeological theory around embodied memory; especially Connerton’s (1989) division of memory claims into three kinds. These are: personal memory claims; cognitive memory claims and habit-memory. It is argued that cognitive memory claims and habit-memory should be regarded as aspects of the same process of remembering: following Gell (1998) and Jones (2007) physical traces of past action are regarded as central to this act of memory. Three encounters with memory are analysed: managing memory around death; remembering how to do activities and formal ritual performances which reinforce group memories. It is argued that all three cases share some of the attributes of a formal ritual performance. An analysis of biographies of practice is proposed to draw out these links between small scale habit-memory and long term group memory.
|Uncontrolled Keywords (separate with ;):||biographies of practice; embodiment; Neolithic caves; ritual; social memory|
|Subjects:||C Auxiliary Sciences of History > CC Archaeology|
|Schools:||College of Science and Technology > School of Forensic & Investigative Sciences|
|Deposited By:||Richard Peterson|
|Deposited On:||29 Mar 2012 19:31|
|Last Modified:||24 Jun 2013 09:40|
Downloads per month over past year
Downloads for past 30 days
Repository Staff Only: item control page