How is hydration assessed and managed in acute stroke? A qualitative study of healthcare staff’s knowledge, attitudes and experiences

Timoroska, Anne-Marie, Miller, Colette orcid iconORCID: 0000-0003-0620-6029, Maley, Alex, Chesworth, Brigit, Jones, Stephanie orcid iconORCID: 0000-0001-9149-8606, Gibson, Josephine orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-3051-1237, Romagnoli, Elisa and Watkins, Caroline Leigh orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-9403-3772 (2022) How is hydration assessed and managed in acute stroke? A qualitative study of healthcare staff’s knowledge, attitudes and experiences. Journal of Clinical Nursing . ISSN 0962-1067

[thumbnail of Version of Record]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

1MB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16332

Abstract

Aims and Objectives
To explore healthcare staff’s experiences of how dehydration is identified and managed in hospitalised patients after acute stroke, and facilitators and challenges to optimising hydration.

Background
Optimal hydration post-stroke reduces the risk of neurological deterioration and other complications. Patients are at risk of dehydration in acute stroke, particularly those with dysphagia.

Design
A descriptive qualitative study reported following the COREQ guidelines.

Methods
Semi-structured interviews, utilising patient vignettes, were conducted in 2018 (Apr-Oct) with a purposive sample of 30 multi-disciplinary staff members from two UK stroke units. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis identified common themes which were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behaviour Change Wheel.

Results
The themes mapped to twelve of the fourteen domains in the Theoretical Domains Framework. Participants believed that inadequate hydration management had potentially serious consequences, and described complex knowledge, skills and cognitive elements to effective hydration care. Participants felt that maintaining hydration was a multidisciplinary responsibility requiring good communication. Although the performance of initial dysphagia screening was reinforced by external
audit, other areas of post-stroke hydration management were not; notably, there was no established method of assessing hydration. Barriers to maintaining good hydration included lack of staff, out-of-hours working patterns, low priority given to hydration, patients’ co-morbidities, and complex post-stroke disabilities such as dysphagia, aphasia, inattention and hemiparesis.

Conclusion
Findings highlighted the importance of assessing and maintaining hydration but identified barriers to, and variation in, clinical practice. To provide optimal care, barriers to the prevention and treatment of dehydration after stroke must be further understood and addressed.

Relevance to Clinical Practice
Multidisciplinary teamwork is important in hydration care after stroke, but clarity is required about the specific contributions of each team member. Without this, hydration care becomes ‘everybody’s and nobody’s job’.


Repository Staff Only: item control page