Schroeder, Doris (2012) Human Rights and Human Dignity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15 (3). pp. 323-335. ISSN 1386-2820
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9326-3
Why should all human beings have certain rights simply by virtue of being human? One justification is an appeal to religious authority. However, in increasingly secular societies this approach has its limits. An alternative answer is that human rights are justified through human dignity. This paper argues that human rights and human dignity are better separated for three reasons. First, the justification paradox: the concept of human dignity does not solve the justification problem for human rights but rather aggravates it in secular societies. Second, the Kantian cul-de-sac: if human rights were based on Kant’s concept of dignity rather than theist grounds, such rights would lose their universal validity. Third, hazard by association: human dignity is nowadays more controversial than the concept of human rights, especially given unresolved tensions between aspirational dignity and inviolable dignity. In conclusion, proponents of universal human rights will fare better with alternative frameworks to justify human rights rather than relying on the concept of dignity.
|Uncontrolled Keywords (separate with ;):||Dignity;Human rights;Kant|
|Subjects:||Historical & philosophical studies > Philosophy not elsewhere classified|
|Schools:||College of Health and Wellbeing > School of Health Sciences|
|Deposited By:||Cathy Lennon|
|Deposited On:||21 Mar 2012 12:28|
|Last Modified:||17 May 2016 12:29|
Downloads per month over past year
Downloads for past 30 days
Repository Staff Only: item control page