Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction
Marsh, John E., Hughes, Robert W. and Jones, Dylan M. (2009) Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction. Cognition, 110 (1). pp. 23-38. ISSN 0010-0277
|
PDF (Publisher's post-print for classroom teaching and internal training purposes at UCLan)
- Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only 261Kb |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003
Abstract
Distraction by irrelevant background sound of visually-based cognitive tasks illustrates the vulnerability of attentional selectivity across modalities. Four experiments centred on auditory distraction during tests of memory for visually-presented semantic information. Meaningful irrelevant speech disrupted the free recall of semantic category-exemplars more than meaningless irrelevant sound (Experiment 1). This effect was exacerbated when the irrelevant speech was semantically related to the to-be-remembered material (Experiment 2). Importantly, however, these effects of meaningfulness and semantic relatedness were shown to arise only when instructions emphasized recall by category rather than by serial order (Experiments 3 and 4). The results favor a process-oriented, rather than a structural, approach to the breakdown of attentional selectivity and forgetting: performance is impaired by the similarity of process brought to bear on the relevant and irrelevant material, not the similarity in item content.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords (separate with ;): | Auditory distraction; Semantic interference; Selective attention; Interference-by-process; Semantic-category clustering |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Schools: | School of Psychology |
| ID Code: | 5804 |
| Deposited By: | Charlotte John |
| Deposited On: | 15 Oct 2012 09:55 |
| Last Modified: | 20 Feb 2013 15:02 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page
Tools
Tools




