Hadjri, Karim and Crozier, Carl (2009) Post-occupancy evaluation: purpose, benefits and barriers. Facilities, 27 (1/2). pp. 21-33. ISSN 0263-2772
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632770910923063
Purpose: This paper explores the historical development of POE in order to provide a contextual backdrop to current discussions.
Design/methodology/approach: This paper attempts to establish what POE is and does, and explores POE methodologies.
Findings: This paper concludes that the fact that this topic is extensively discussed highlights a growing frustration with the lack of progress toward POE becoming a mainstream activity in the process of building procurement. Other findings include POE’s exclusion from professional curricula; who pays for POE? And issues with professional liability and its contribution to this lack of use.
Research limitations/implications: None, given that this paper presents a literature review.
Practical implications: The paper presents the benefits accrued by stakeholders in the building procurement process, and the barriers to the adoption of POE that need to be addressed.
Originality/value: This literature review suggests that despite the trials and tribulations, POE has progressed from a one dimensional feedback process to a multidimensional process that, as an integrated element, can help drive the building procurement process forward. The paper presents an objective overview of literary discourse around POE, its potential and limitations.
|Uncontrolled Keywords (separate with ;):||Architecture; Facilities; Procurement; United Kingdom|
|Subjects:||N Fine Arts > NA Architecture|
|Schools:||College of Culture & the Creative Industries > School of Art, Design and Fashion|
|Deposited By:||Karim Hadjri|
|Deposited On:||10 Sep 2012 10:50|
|Last Modified:||13 Aug 2015 15:43|
Downloads per month over past year
Downloads for past 30 days
Repository Staff Only: item control page