• skip to content
  • skip to navigation
  • skip to supporting content
Homepage
CLOK - Central Lancashire Online Knowledge
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Policies
  • Deposit Guide: Research eTheses
  • Copyright Guide
  • Contact
  • Links
    • Login
  • Deposit
  • Search Item
  • Search FullText
  • Browse

An evaluation of staff and patients views of and strategies employed to manage inpatient aggression and violence on one mental health unit: A pluralistic design

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Duxbury, J. (2002) An evaluation of staff and patients views of and strategies employed to manage inpatient aggression and violence on one mental health unit: A pluralistic design. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 9 (3). pp. 325-337. ISSN 1351-0126

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2850.2002.00497.x

Abstract

Following an initial springboard study, a further more extensive piece of research was conducted to identify and evaluate approaches used to manage patient aggression and violence on three acute mental health wards. Data were gathered using an incident form, a questionnaire and interviews. The views of patients (n = 80), nurses (n = 72) and medical staff (n = 10) were explored. Findings revealed a clear distinction between the way staff and patients view both the problem and the response. Patients’ view present staff approaches as ‘controlling’ and believe that environmental and poor communication factors underpin aggressive behaviour. Staff, conversely, attribute aggressive behaviour to internal patient and external factors, which may explain the reason for approaches used. A strong correlation was found between type of patient aggression and response (r = 0.36, P < 0.000) and a high percentage of incidents reported were of an aggressive, as opposed to violent, nature. For example 70% of incidents involved verbal abuse or threat. Despite this, 47% (n = 103) of approaches incorporated the use of medication, restraint or seclusion. These are commonly referred to as traditional methods. Patients clearly view this controlling style as a part of the problem and an emphasis upon control and symptom reduction may be inappropriate given the type of aggression encountered. Key issues were further analysed using an internal, external and situational model, each of which endeavour to explain reasons for patient aggression from different perspectives. It is this emphasis upon sole perspectives that may both contribute to and result in the use of a limited number of management approaches adopted in practice. The integration of all three models to examine the complex nature of patient aggression and violence from a variety of perspectives may be the way forward. As a result, approaches to deal with this problem could be more meaningful and subsequently effective.


Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords (separate with ;): aggression management; evaluation; psychiatry
Subjects:R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RT Nursing
Schools:School of Health
ID Code:85
Deposited By: EPrints Services
Deposited On:03 Feb 2010 15:20
Last Modified:29 Oct 2012 14:06

Repository Staff Only: item control page

University of Central Lancashire

Preston,
Lancashire,
PR1 2HE

Tel: +44 (0)1772 201 201

Other Links

  • Contact UCLan
  • How to find us
  • Help

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • UCLan RSS
  • Contact UCLan
  • Copyright |
  • Disclaimer |
  • Data Protection Act |
  • Freedom of Information