Counterfactual reasoning for regretted situations involving controllable versus uncontrollable events: The modulating role of contingent self-esteem

Wilkinson, MR, Ball, Linden orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-5099-0124 and Alford, D (2015) Counterfactual reasoning for regretted situations involving controllable versus uncontrollable events: The modulating role of contingent self-esteem. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 11 (1). pp. 22-30. ISSN 1895-1171

[thumbnail of Wilkinson et al. 2015.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
291kB

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0168-4

Abstract

We report a study that examined the modulating impact of contingent self-esteem on regret
intensity for regretted outcomes associated with controllable versus uncontrollable events.
The Contingent Self-Esteem Scale (e.g., Kernis & Goldman, 2006) was used to assess the extent
to which a person’s sense of self-worth is based on self and others’ expectations. We found
that there was an influence of self-esteem contingency for controllable but not for uncontrollable
regret types. For controllable regret types individuals with a high contingent (i.e., unstable)
self-esteem reported greater regret intensity than those with a low contingent (i.e., stable)
self-esteem. We interpret this finding as reflecting a functional and adaptive role of high
contingent self-esteem in terms of mobilizing the application of counterfactual reasoning
and planning mechanisms that can enable personal expectations to be achieved in the future.


Repository Staff Only: item control page