GAMA/H-ATLAS: Common star-formation rate indicators and their dependence on galaxy physical parameter

Wang, L, Gunawardhana, MLP, Heinis, S, Baldry, IK, Bland-Hawthorn, J, Bourne, N, Brough, S, Brown, MJI, Cluver, ME et al (2016) GAMA/H-ATLAS: Common star-formation rate indicators and their dependence on galaxy physical parameter. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 461 (2). pp. 1898-1916. ISSN 0035-8711

[thumbnail of This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.]
Preview
PDF (This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.) - Published Version
1MB

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1450

Abstract

We compare common star-formation rate (SFR) indicators in the local Universe in the GAMA equatorial fields (∼ 160 deg2), using ultraviolet (UV) photometry from
GALEX, far-infrared (FIR) and sub-millimetre (sub-mm) photometry from H-ATLAS,
and Hα spectroscopy from the GAMA survey. With a high-quality sample of 745 galaxies (median redshift (z) = 0.08), we consider three SFR tracers: UV luminosity
corrected for dust attenuation using the UV spectral slope β (SFRUV,corr), Hα line luminosity corrected for dust using the Balmer decrement (BD) (SFRHα,corr), and the combination of UV and IR emission (SFRUV+IR). We demonstrate that SFRUV,corr can be reconciled with the other two tracers after applying attenuation corrections by calibrating IRX (i.e. the IR to UV luminosity ratio) and attenuation in the Hα (derived from BD) against β. However, β on its own is very unlikely to be a reliable attenuation indicator. We find that attenuation correction factors depend on parameters such as stellar mass (M∗), z and dust temperature (Tdust), but not on Hα equivalent width (EW) or Sersic index. Due to the large scatter in the IRX vs β correlation, when compared to SFRUV+IR, the β-corrected SFRUV,corr exhibits systematic deviations as a function of IRX, BD and Tdust.


Repository Staff Only: item control page