Solidarities and Tensions in Mental Health Politics: Mad Studies and Psychopolitics

Cresswell, Mark and Spandler, Helen orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-0970-5141 (2016) Solidarities and Tensions in Mental Health Politics: Mad Studies and Psychopolitics. Critical and Radical Social Work . ISSN 2049 8608

[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

137kB

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/204986016X14739257401605

Abstract

Recent years have seen a resurgence in radical mental health politics and accompanying social movements. This article identifies two tendencies. The first, the Mad Studies tendency, indicts psychiatry as a branch of medicine and asserts a politics of identity based upon the experience of ‘madness’. The second, the Psychopolitics tendency, defends the value of welfare and medicine and asserts a politics of alliance between service users and mental health workers. Using three recent texts, Madmatters (2013), Psychiatry disrupted (2014) and Madness, distress and the politics of disablement (2015), this article analyses the solidarities and tensions that exist within and between these tendencies.


Repository Staff Only: item control page