Response to Thackeray (2016) – The possibility of lichen growth on bones of Homo naledi: Were they exposed to light?

Randolph-Quinney, Patrick, S. orcid iconORCID: 0000-0003-0694-5868, Backwell, Lucinda, R., Berger, Lee R., Hawks, John, Roberts, Eric, M., Nhauro, Godwin and Kramers, Jan (2016) Response to Thackeray (2016) – The possibility of lichen growth on bones of Homo naledi: Were they exposed to light? South African Journal of Science, 112 (9/10). ISSN 0038-2353

[thumbnail of Version of Record]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

3MB
[thumbnail of Bibliography] PDF (Bibliography) - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

165kB

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/a0177

Abstract

Thackeray1 questions the hypothesis of deliberate body disposal in the Rising Star Cave by Homo naledi, as proposed by Dirks and colleagues2. Thackeray proposes that lichens produced mineral staining on the skeletal remains of H. naledi. As lichens require some exposure to light, in Thackeray’s opinion, the presence of mineral staining necessitates either a direct entrance deep into the Rising Star Cave that once admitted light into the Dinaledi Chamber, or relocation of mineral-stained bones from a location exposed to light. Here we consider multiple lines of evidence that reject Thackeray’s hypothesis that lichens deposited mineral staining upon the surface of these skeletal remains. We welcome the opportunity to address the inferences presented by Thackeray, and further hope that this response may dispel misinterpretations of our research2, and of other areas of the scientific literature that bear upon site formation processes at work within the Rising Star Cave system.


Repository Staff Only: item control page