Lists
Lists
Fairclough, Isabela 
ORCID: 0000-0001-6718-2636
(2018)
"Conductive" argumentation in the UK fracking debate.
In:
Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation.
Studies in Logic and Argumentation, II
.
College Publications, London, pp. 297-310.
ISBN 978-1-84890-284-8
Preview |
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript)
- Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 685kB |
Official URL: http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/logic/sla/?00...
Abstract
From a critical rationalist perspective, I look at a fragment of the debate on shale gas exploration in the UK in order to make a proposal on the nature and representation of “conductive” argumentation, arguing it should not be viewed as a single argument, but in relation to deliberation as genre. There is no “conductive argumentation”, only various possible outcomes of deliberation, seen as critical testing of (alternative) proposals.
Repository Staff Only: item control page
