Are Individual Differences in Auditory Processing Related to Auditory Distraction by Irrelevant Sound? A Replication Study

Elliott, Emily, Marsh, John Everett orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-9494-1287, Zeringue, Jenna and McGill, Corey (2020) Are Individual Differences in Auditory Processing Related to Auditory Distraction by Irrelevant Sound? A Replication Study. Memory & Cognition, 48 . pp. 145-157. ISSN 0090-502X

[thumbnail of Version of Record]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

398kB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00968-8

Abstract

Irrelevant sounds can be very distracting, especially when trying to recall information according to its serial order. The irrelevant sound effect (ISE) has been studied in the literature for more than 40 years, yet many questions remain. One goal that has received little attention involves the discernment of a predictive factor, or individual difference characteristic, that would help to determine the size of the ISE. The current experiments were designed to replicate and extend prior work by Macken, Phelps, and Jones (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139–144, 2009), who demonstrated a significant predictive relationship between the size of the ISE and a type of auditory processing called global pattern matching. The authors also found a relationship between auditory processing involving deliberate recoding of sounds and serial order recall performance in silence. Across two experiments, this dissociation was not replicated. Additionally, the two types of auditory processing were not significantly correlated with each other. The lack of a clear pattern of findings replicating the Macken et al. (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139–144, 2009) study raises several questions regarding the need for future research on the characteristics of these auditory processing tasks, and the stability of the measurement of the ISE itself.


Repository Staff Only: item control page