An update on developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 64

Daniel, Michelle, Gordon, Morris orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-1216-5158, Patricio, Madalena, Hider, Ahmad, Pawlik, Cameron, Bhagdev, Rhea, Ahmad, Shoaib, Alston, Sebastian, Park, Sophie et al (2021) An update on developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 64. Medical Teacher, 43 (3). pp. 253-271. ISSN 0142-159X

[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

355kB
[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript - Table 1]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript - Table 1) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

698kB
[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript - Tables 2-6]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript - Tables 2-6) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

93kB
[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript - Figures]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript - Figures) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

290kB
[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript - Appendices 1-2]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript - Appendices 1-2) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

79kB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1864310

Abstract

Background
COVID-19 has fundamentally altered how education is delivered. Gordon et al. previously conducted a review of medical education developments in response to COVID-19; however, the field has rapidly evolved in the ensuing months. This scoping review aims to map the extent, range and nature of subsequent developments, summarizing the expanding evidence base and identifying areas for future research.

Methods
The authors followed the five stages of a scoping review outlined by Arskey and O’Malley. Four online databases and MedEdPublish were searched. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts. Included articles described developments in medical education deployed in response to COVID-19 and reported outcomes. Data extraction was completed by two authors and synthesized into a variety of maps and charts.

Results
One hundred twenty-seven articles were included: 104 were from North America, Asia and Europe; 51 were undergraduate, 41 graduate, 22 continuing medical education, and 13 mixed; 35 were implemented by universities, 75 by academic hospitals, and 17 by organizations or collaborations. The focus of developments included pivoting to online learning (n = 58), simulation (n = 24), assessment (n = 11), well-being (n = 8), telehealth (n = 5), clinical service reconfigurations (n = 4), interviews (n = 4), service provision (n = 2), faculty development (n = 2) and other (n = 9). The most common Kirkpatrick outcome reported was Level 1, however, a number of studies reported 2a or 2b. A few described Levels 3, 4a, 4b or other outcomes (e.g. quality improvement).


Repository Staff Only: item control page