The efficacy of repetitions-in-reserve vs. traditional percentage-based resistance training: a 4-week pre-season randomized intervention in elite rugby league players.

Sinclair, Jonathan Kenneth orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-2231-3732, Edmundson, Christopher James orcid iconORCID: 0000-0003-2275-7584 and Bentley, Ian orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-9086-2338 (2021) The efficacy of repetitions-in-reserve vs. traditional percentage-based resistance training: a 4-week pre-season randomized intervention in elite rugby league players. Sport Sciences for Health . ISSN 1824-7490

[thumbnail of Version of Record]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

800kB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-021-00837-5

Abstract

PURPOSE: This two-experiment study aimed to examine 1. the accuracy and reliability of repetitions-in-reserve and 2. using a randomized trial, the efficacy of repetition-inreserve compared to traditional percentage-based training during a 4-week pre-season strength training block in elite rugby league players.
METHODS: In experiment 1, participants performed deadlift, bench press and weighted pull up exercises for 3, 6, and 9 repetitions to failure using self-selected loads. This was undertaken on two occasions, separated by 8-weeks. In experiment 2,
participants were randomly separated into either repetitions-in-reserve or percentage based training groups. They completed a 4-week pre-season training block with training prescribed based on the group to which they were assigned. Measures of body
mass and 3 repetition max strength in the aforementioned exercises were measured pre and post intervention.
RESULTS: Experiment 1 showed that repetitions-in-reserve exhibited generally acceptable levels of accuracy and moderate-good levels of reliability. However, the deadlift when the required number of repetitions was 6 and 9 and the bench press
when number of repetitions was 9 were not associated with acceptable levels of accuracy and reliability respectively. Experiment 2 showed that there were no differences between repetitions-in-reserve or percentage-based training group for the
strength outcomes, although there were significant increases in body mass in the percentage-based group (pre = 85.6 ± 10.6 kg, post = 86.4 ± 10.8 kg).
CONCLUSION: Repetitions-in-reserve is generally associated with acceptable levels of accuracy and moderate-good levels of reliability, although there were some exceptions for the deadlift in relation to accuracy and bench press for reliability. Experiment 2 shows that although there were no differences between groups for the strength-based outcomes, significant increases in body mass in the percentage-based group may make this approach a more effective approach to prepare players for the rigors of the rugby league season.


Repository Staff Only: item control page