Scoping review of the use of virtual reality in intensive care units

Hill, James Edward orcid iconORCID: 0000-0003-1430-6927, Twamley, Jacqueline, Breed, Hetty, Kenyon, Roger, Casey, Rob, Zhang, Jennifer and Clegg, Andrew orcid iconORCID: 0000-0001-8938-7819 (2021) Scoping review of the use of virtual reality in intensive care units. Nursing in Critical Care . ISSN 1362-1017

[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

531kB
[thumbnail of PRISMA 2020 Checklist]
Preview
PDF (PRISMA 2020 Checklist) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

68kB
[thumbnail of Supplementary File 1]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary File 1) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

160kB
[thumbnail of GRIPP2 Table]
Preview
PDF (GRIPP2 Table) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

124kB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12732

Abstract

Background
A wide range of reviews have demonstrated the effectiveness and tolerability of Virtual Reality (VR) in a range of clinical areas and subpopulations. However, no previous review has explored the current maturity, acceptability, tolerability, and effectiveness of VR with intensive care patients.

Aims
To identify the range of uses of VR for intensive care patients, classify their current phase of development, effectiveness, acceptability, and tolerability.

Methods
A scoping review was conducted. A multi-database search was undertaken (inception to January 2021). Any type of study which examined the use of VR with the target application population of intensive care patients were included. Screening, data extraction, and assessment of quality were undertaken by a single reviewer. A meta-analysis and a descriptive synthesis were undertaken.

Results
Six hundred and forty-seven records were identified, after duplicate removal and screening 21 studies were included (weak quality). The majority of studies for relaxation, delirium, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) were at the early stages of assessing acceptability, tolerability, and initial clinical efficacy. Virtual Reality for relaxation and delirium were well-tolerated with completion rates of target treatment of 73.6%, (95% CI:51.1%-96%, I2 = 98.52%) 52.7% (95% CI:52.7%-100%, I2 = 96.8%). The majority of reasons for non-completion were due to external clinical factors. There were some potential benefits demonstrated for the use of VR for relaxation, delirium, and sleep.

Conclusion
Virtual Reality for intensive care is a new domain of research with the majority of areas of application being in the early stages of development. There is great potential for the use of VR in this clinical environment. Further robust assessment of effectiveness is required before any clinical recommendations can be made.


Repository Staff Only: item control page