What can management theories offer evidence-based practice? A comparative analysis of measurement tools for organisational context

French, Beverley, Thomas, Lois Helene orcid iconORCID: 0000-0001-5218-6546, Baker, Paula, Burton, Christopher R, Pennington, Lindsay and Roddam, Hazel orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-0637-1801 (2009) What can management theories offer evidence-based practice? A comparative analysis of measurement tools for organisational context. Implementation Science, 4 (1). pp. 1-15. ISSN 1748-5908

[thumbnail of French B (2009) Implementation Science.pdf]
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.


Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-28


Given the current emphasis on networks as vehicles for innovation and change in health service delivery, the ability to conceptualise and measure organisational enablers for the social construction of knowledge merits attention. This study aimed to develop a composite tool to measure the organisational context for evidence-based practice (EBP) in healthcare.

A structured search of the major healthcare and management databases for measurement tools from four domains: research utilisation (RU), research activity (RA), knowledge management (KM), and organisational learning (OL). Included studies were reports of the development or use of measurement tools that included organisational factors. Tools were appraised for face and content validity, plus development and testing methods. Measurement tool items were extracted, merged across the four domains, and categorised within a constructed framework describing the absorptive and receptive capacities of organisations.

Thirty measurement tools were identified and appraised. Eighteen tools from the four domains were selected for item extraction and analysis. The constructed framework consists of seven categories relating to three core organisational attributes of vision, leadership, and a learning culture, and four stages of knowledge need, acquisition of new knowledge, knowledge sharing, and knowledge use. Measurement tools from RA or RU domains had more items relating to the categories of leadership, and acquisition of new knowledge; while tools from KM or learning organisation domains had more items relating to vision, learning culture, knowledge need, and knowledge sharing. There was equal emphasis on knowledge use in the different domains.

If the translation of evidence into knowledge is viewed as socially mediated, tools to measure the organisational context of EBP in healthcare could be enhanced by consideration of related concepts from the organisational and management sciences. Comparison of measurement tools across domains suggests that there is scope within EBP for supplementing the current emphasis on human and technical resources to support information uptake and use by individuals. Consideration of measurement tools from the fields of KM and OL shows more content related to social mechanisms to facilitate knowledge recognition, translation, and transfer between individuals and groups.

Repository Staff Only: item control page