Individuals with impaired lumbopelvic control demonstrate lumbar multifidus muscle activation deficit using ultrasound imaging in conjunction with electrical stimulation: A cross-sectional study.

Sungnak, Panakorn, Songjaroen, Sranya, Krityakiarana, Warin, Wang, Hsing-Kuo, Richards, James orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-4004-3115 and Wattananon, Peemongkon (2022) Individuals with impaired lumbopelvic control demonstrate lumbar multifidus muscle activation deficit using ultrasound imaging in conjunction with electrical stimulation: A cross-sectional study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation . ISSN 0003-9993

[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

387kB

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.02.010

Abstract

Objective: To determine lumbar multifidus muscle (LM) activation deficits in individuals with impaired lumbopelvic control (iLPC) based on musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) in conjunction with electrical stimulation approach, and the correlation between back extension force and LM activation.
Design: A cross-sectional study design.
Setting: A university laboratory.
Participants: Fifty participants (25 iLPC and 25 NoLBP) were recruited from the university physical therapy clinic and surrounding areas.
Main Outcome Measures: The MSKUS was used to measure LM thickness at rest, maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), and electrical stimulation combined with MVIC, while a hand-held dynamometer was used to record force during MVIC and electrical stimulation combined with MVIC. These data were used to derive LM activation (LMACT) and percentage force generation (ForceGEN).
Results: The iLPC group had significantly lower LMACT (17%) than the NoLBP group (P<0.05). No significant difference was seen in ForceGEN between the NoLBP and iLPC groups (P>0.05). No significant correlation was seen between LMACT and ForceGEN (P>0.05).
Conclusion: The findings support the utility of our protocol to determine LM activation deficits. The lower LM activation in iLPC group suggests that individuals with iLPC were unable to fully recruit the motor units available in LM. Force generation measurements may not be an appropriate approach to determine such deficits in LM.


Repository Staff Only: item control page