Bonsaksen, Tore, Ruffolo, Mary, Price, Daicia, Leung, Janni, Thygesen, Hilde, Lamph, Gary ORCID: 0000-0002-4099-2812, Kabelenga, Isaac and Geirdal, Amy Østertun (2023) Associations between social media use and loneliness in a cross-national population: Do motives for social media use matter? Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 11 (1).
Preview |
PDF (VOR)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. 1MB |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2158089
Abstract
Background: We aimed to examine the association between social media use and loneliness two years after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak.
Methods: Participants were 1649 adults who completed a cross-sectional online survey disseminated openly in Norway, United Kingdom, USA, and Australia between November
2021 and January 2022. Linear regressions examined time spent on social media and participants’ characteristics on loneliness, and interactions by motives for social media use.
Results: Participants who worried more about their health and were younger, not employed, and without a spouse or partner reported higher levels of loneliness compared to their
counterparts. More time spent on social media was associated with more loneliness (β = 0.12, p < 0.001). Three profile groups emerged for social media use motives: 1) social media use motive ratings on avoiding difficult feelings higher or the same as for maintaining contact; 2) slightly higher ratings for maintaining contact; and 3) substantially higher ratings for maintaining contact. Time spent on social media was significant only in motive profile groups 2 and 3 (β = 0.12 and β = 0.14, both p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that people who use social media for the motive of maintaining their relationships feel lonelier than those who spend the same amount of time on social media for other reasons. While social media may facilitate social contact to a degree, they may not facilitate the type of contact sought by those who use social media primarily for this reason.
Repository Staff Only: item control page