Robinson, Sarita Jane ORCID: 0000-0002-4237-5412, Brooks, Matthew
ORCID: 0000-0002-5469-7769, Fallon, Naomi
ORCID: 0000-0002-6997-2719, Campodonico, Carolina
ORCID: 0000-0002-7054-1107 and Liyanage, Champika Lasanthi
ORCID: 0000-0001-6687-3611
(2025)
Perceived preparedness and mental health in response to the Coronavirus pandemic in the UK population.
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 19
(e47).
pp. 1-8.
ISSN 1935-7893
Preview |
PDF (VOR)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 329kB |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2025.42
Abstract
Objectives: Preparedness levels have been shown to improve the outcomes for people who find themselves in an emergency. However, uptake of preparedness behaviours by the public prior to a major disaster is limited. This two-part study examined perceived preparedness in the UK during the first months of the Covid-19 pandemic (Study 1), and two years later (Study 2).
Methods: Both studies investigated the effect of individual demographics (gender, age, perceived socioeconomic and health status) on perceived preparedness. Next, the studies examined the extent to which perceived preparedness was associated with mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms). Participants (Study 1, N = 409) completed an online survey in May to June 2020 during a national lockdown, with another sample (Study 2, N = 87) completing the same survey from March to July 2022.
Results: Across both studies, participants completed two to three different preparedness activities. Greater subjective perceptions of socioeconomic status were associated with perceived preparedness. Preparedness levels were related with better mental health, and unrelated to age and gender.
Conclusions: Encouraging the public to engage with preparedness behaviours may not only have practical benefits but also help to protect mental wellbeing during a disaster.
Repository Staff Only: item control page