Religion and Political Form: Carl Schmitt’s Genealogy of Politics as Critique of Habermas’s Post-secular Discourse

Cerella, Antonio (2012) Religion and Political Form: Carl Schmitt’s Genealogy of Politics as Critique of Habermas’s Post-secular Discourse. Review of International Studies, 38 (5). pp. 975-994. ISSN 0260-2105

[thumbnail of Cerella_RIS.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
601kB
[thumbnail of Author's post-print]
Preview
PDF (Author's post-print) - Accepted Version
376kB

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210512000435

Abstract

Jürgen Habermas's post-secular account is rapidly attracting attention in many fields as a theoretical framework through which to reconsider the role of religion in contemporary societies. This work seeks to go beyond Habermas's conceptualisation by placing the post-secular discourse within a broader genealogy of the relationships between space, religion, and politics. Drawing on the work of Carl Schmitt, the aim of this article is to contrast the artificial separation between private and public, religious and secular, state and church, and the logic of inclusion/exclusion on which modernity was established. Revisiting this genealogy is also crucial to illustrating, in light of Schmitt's political theory, the problems underlying Habermas's proposal, emphasising its hidden homogenising and universalist logic in an attempt to offer an alternative reflection on the contribution of religious and cultural pluralism within Western democracies.


Repository Staff Only: item control page