Global Ethics and Nanotechnology: A Comparison of the Nanoethics Environments of the EU and China

Dalton-Brown, Sally (2012) Global Ethics and Nanotechnology: A Comparison of the Nanoethics Environments of the EU and China. NanoEthics, 6 (2). pp. 137-150. ISSN 1871-4757

[thumbnail of Authors Post_Print]
Preview
PDF (Authors Post_Print) - Accepted Version
178kB

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0146-2

Abstract

The following article offers a brief overview of current nanotechnology policy, regulation and ethics in Europe and The People’s Republic of China with the intent of noting (dis)similarities in approach, before focusing on the involvement of the public in science and technology policy (i.e. participatory Technology Assessment). The conclusions of this article are, that (a) in terms of nanosafety as expressed through policy and regulation, China PR and the EU have similar approaches towards, and concerns about, nanotoxicity—the official debate on benefits and risks is not markedly different in the two regions; (b) that there is a similar economic drive behind both regions’ approach to nanodevelopment, the difference being the degree of public concern admitted; and (c) participation in decision-making is fundamentally different in the two regions. Thus in China PR, the focus is on the responsibility of the scientist; in the EU, it is about government accountability to the public. The formulation of a Code of Conduct for scientists in both regions (China PR’s predicted for 2012) reveals both similarity and difference in approach to nanotechnology development. This may change, since individual responsibility alone cannot guide S&T development, and as public participation is increasingly seen globally as integral to governmental decision-making.


Repository Staff Only: item control page