Note: issues of importance, timing and method relating to peer review of journal manuscripts

Abstract

Purpose: To highlight issues of importance, timing and method relating to peer review of academic journal manuscripts: in a broad context generally; and with respect to the Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction (JFMPC), more specifically. Approach: Synthesis of extant literature combined with the author’s experientially-gained views as a researcher, author, reviewer and editor. Findings: Opinions on the importance, timing and methods of peer review can vary widely, among individuals and publishing outlets. Notwithstanding this, based on the ‘Approach’ above, a cogent description of these peer review issues is defined and presented. Research implications: It is proffered that a robust peer review process yields benefits for researchers, authors, editors, journals, publishers and the end-users of published research. The note has potential implications for all of these stakeholders. Originality: The discussion complements existing literature in this field, while its specific guidance for JFMPC stakeholders is new. Keywords: Research, writing, reviewing, peers, publishing, journals, quality.