Amabile‘s consensual assessment technique: Why has it not been used more in design creativity research?

Jeffries, Karl K. orcid iconORCID: 0000-0002-8936-1800 (2012) Amabile‘s consensual assessment technique: Why has it not been used more in design creativity research? In: 2nd International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC2012), Glasgow.

[thumbnail of Reprint from conference proceedings]
Preview
PDF (Reprint from conference proceedings) - Published Version
935kB

Official URL: http://www.icdc2012.org.uk/

Abstract

Amabile’s Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) has been described as the “gold standard” of creativity assessment; been extensively used within creativity research, and is seen as the most popular method of assessing creative outputs. Its discussion within scholarly research has continued to grow year by year. However, since 1996, a systematic review of the CAT has not been undertaken, and, within design journals, appears not to have occurred, in relation to design, or more broadly, the creative industries in general. Yet, the consensus of domain judges is a prevalent methodology for design education, and professional design awards. This paper presents the findings from a systematic literature review of the CAT covering works from 1982 to 2011. It details key journals and authors publishing or citing CAT related studies, and highlights the limited number of CAT studies within design journals, with suggestions for why this may be the case.


Repository Staff Only: item control page